Governance & Territories

Municipalities, Territorial Resilience, and State Reconstruction in Haiti (2010–2026): Intermunicipal Cooperation, Partnerships, and Human Security

August 2026 · By Wilbert Georges, Founder and Executive Lead of AGRILEAD Training & Consulting LLC

Abstract

This article examines how national crises, territorial imbalances, and state reconstruction interacted in Haiti between 2010 and 2026. Drawing on qualitative document analysis of sources available through August 11, 2026, it identifies two major disruption s. The January 2010 earthquake exposed systemic risks associated with the concentration of institutions, public services, and strategic infrastructure around Port -au-Prince, as well as the limits of reconstruction insufficiently linked to territorial rebalancing. The institutional and security crisis that began in July 2021 intensified these vulnerabilities through weakened democratic representation, the territorial spread of armed violence and armed-group influence, internal displacement, and disruption of agricultural areas and economic networks. The article assesses when municipalities may support territorial resilience, continuity of selected public services, and human security. Municipal capacity must be strengthened, but local governments cannot replac e the central state's core sovereign functions. Sustainable reconstruction therefore requires complementary central and territorial institutions, intermunicipal cooperation, multilevel coordination, and closer alignment among public, humanitarian, and development interventions.

Keywords: municipalities; territorial resilience; state reconstruction; intermunicipal cooperation; human security; decentralized cooperation; Haiti

Introduction

Haiti's national political and administrative functions, specialized services, businesses, and financial institutions are highly concentrated in the Port -au-Prince metropolitan area. An OECD review, drawing on Haitian planning data, reported that the metro politan area contained approximately 40% of the population, 70% of businesses, 90% of banking institutions, 50% of hospitals, and more than 30% of schools (Organisation for Economic Co -operation and Development [OECD], 2021). This concentration makes national functioning highly dependent on a relatively small geographic area and limits the ability of secondary cities and municipalities to maintain selected functions when the center is disrupted. Territorial fragility therefore stems not only from weak local administrations, but also from the uneven distribution of public -sector capacity, resources, and infrastructure across the country.

The January 12, 2010 earthquake exposed the systemic consequences of this concentration with exceptional severity. Because it struck the country's principal political, administrative, and economic center, the earthquake disrupted institutions and services on which the entire national territory depended. The World Bank reports that all but one of the country's ministries, key administrative buildings, and much of the service-delivery infrastructure in and around the capital collapsed or were destroyed (World Bank, 2019). The disaster also increased pressure on municipalities that already had limited financial, technical, and institutional capacity. Subsequent reconstruction restored some public functions and rehabilitated infrastructure, but it did not produce a lasting correction of the territorial imbalances revealed by the disaster. Beginning in July 2021, the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse, the prolonged erosion of democratic representation, the territorial expansion of armed groups, and intensified internal displacement further aggravated these vulnerabilities. Disruptions to economic activity, public services, production areas, and commercial networks confirmed that hyperconcentration is not merely a matter of spatial planning or local development. It is also a source of national vulnerability because a crisis affecting the center can interrupt essential functions and generate institutional, economic, and social consequences throughout the country.

Scholarship on state reconstruction, territorial resilience, and local government capacity often treats these issues in isolation. This analytical fragmentation obscures the relationships among the spatial distribution of public capacity, continuity of ser vices, and crisis response. This article therefore examines municipalities not as substitutes for the central state, but as territorial components of a more resilient system of public authority. Administrative proximity alone does not guarantee effective public action, particularly when local governments lack predictable resources, qualified personnel, and minimum security conditions. It can nevertheless improve knowledge of local conditions, stakeholder coordination, and continuity of selected functions. The research question is as follows: To what extent have successive crises between 2010 and 2026 deepened Haiti's territorial and institutional imbalances, and under what conditions can municipalities and territorial cooperation contribute to resilience and state reconstruction without displacing the state's core sovereign functions? The article argues that a more territorially distributed organization of public action can reduce national vulnerability when it is grounded in the complementary strengthening of central and local capacity. The central state remains responsible for security, justice, redistribution, regulation, and national standards. Municipalities may nevertheless help maintain selected services, organize territorial information, coordinate interventions, and support human security when they have adequate administrative capacity, resources, cooperation mechanisms, and a clearly defined institutional relationship with central government. The article's scholarly contribution lies in integrating the analysis of state reconstruction, territorial resilience, and the institutional conditions of municipal action.

The article first presents the methodological approach and the conceptual and analytical framework. It then examines the territorial effects of successive crises and the potential roles of municipalities. The discussion considers the conditions, limitations, and institutional implications of these roles, and the conclusion synthesizes the principal findings and identifies priorities for further research.

1. Methodological Approach

This qualitative, document-based study covers the period from January 12, 2010 to the source cut- off date of August 11, 2026. It focuses first on the earthquake and post-2010 reconstruction and then on the political, security, and humanitarian crisis of 2021–2026. The source base comprises three broad categories: primary and institutional materials, including official political statements, electoral notices, displacement-monitoring reports, food-security analyses, human-rights reporting, seismological records, and post-disaster assessments; legal and policy documents; and scholarly works used to interpret territorial resilience, state capacity, and multilevel governance. The earthquake-related corpus includes the U.S. Geological Survey, the 2010 post-disaster needs assessment, United Nations reporting, and World Bank evidence on fatalities, injuries, displacement, economic damage, and institutional disruption. The contemporary corpus draws primarily on CARICOM, the Haitian Provisional Electoral Council, IOM, IPC, OHCHR, BINUH, United Nations Security Council records, Human Rights Watch, OECD, FAO/WFP, and the Inter- American Development Bank.

Sources were selected for their direct relevance to a specific proposition, methodological transparency, institutional authority, and, for rapidly changing conditions, recency. Official institutional websites were rechecked through August 11, 2026 for time-sensitive political, electoral, security, humanitarian, and displacement claims. Later publications were incorporated only when they materially clarified or superseded the previous record. Nationwide displacement estimates are reported with their data-collection periods, while event-tracking reports are treated separately and are not aggregated with national estimates. Because security and humanitarian conditions are especially volatile, the article uses dated formulations and cautious terms such as control, influence, disruption, and operational pressure rather than treating temporary conditions as stable or relying on unsupported numerical claims.

The analysis distinguishes among three types of statements. Documented facts are attributed to the relevant sources. Analytical interpretations relate those facts to centralization, state capacity, and territorial governance. Normative recommendations identify possible institutional conditions without presenting them as empirically demonstrated outcomes. Maintaining these distinctions preserves the study's document-based and interpretive character.

The absence of direct observation in municipalities, systematic local budget data, and interviews with public authorities or residents limits the study's scope. The effects of the crisis vary across places, and host municipalities differ substantially in capacity. The study does not compare the effectiveness of particular intermunicipal arrangements, establish causal effects, or constitute a systematic review. Its conclusions are therefore analytical rather than empirically generalizable and should be tested through place-based research, comparative case studies, interviews, budget analysis, and analyses of public-service networks.

2. Conceptual and Analytical Framework

Territorial resilience denotes a territory's capacity to absorb a disturbance, preserve essential functions, adapt, and reorient its trajectory. An evolutionary perspective emphasizes adaptation and recomposition rather than a simple return to the pre-crisis state (Boschma, 2015: 735–737). Institutional resilience refers more specifically to the ability of public organizations to continue making decisions, administering programs, learning, and remaining accountable despite shocks. Public-administration scholarship emphasizes that this capacity depends as much on political and organizational arrangements as on technical robustness (Duit, 2016: 365–368).

Human security extends the concept of security beyond physical protection to include the economic, food, health, environmental, personal, community, and political dimensions of human well-being (United Nations Development Programme [UNDP], 1994: 22–25). This framework is especially relevant when armed violence simultaneously disrupts markets, roads, schools, hospitals, and agricultural production. It allows state presence to be assessed not only through coercive capacity, but also through continuity of essential functions.

State capacity refers to the ability of institutions to exercise legitimate authority, mobilize resources, provide services, coordinate actors, and enforce rules. Post-crisis state reconstruction must integrate legitimacy, security, and effectiveness rather than treat central institutions and subnational governance as opposing alternatives (Brinkerhoff, 2005: 4–6). Territorial governance concerns the spatial distribution of this capacity and the relationships among levels of government. Continuity of public services refers to the ability to maintain or rapidly restore essential functions when infrastructure or public administrations are disrupted. It requires contingency planning, reliable data, clear delegation of responsibility, local capacity, and redundant networks. In this article, the territorialization of public action refers to adapting implementation to place-specific realities and organizing multilevel coordination, rather than applying centrally designed arrangements uniformly across the country (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], 2019: 20–24).

Intermunicipal cooperation is a form of horizontal coordination through which municipalities pool services, infrastructure, or technical expertise when the scale of a problem exceeds a single jurisdiction. Multilevel-governance scholarship presents such cooperation as a means of preserving economies of scale without eliminating local autonomy, provided that responsibilities are clear, representation is balanced, and accountability is effective (OECD, 2019: 20–24). Humanitarian coordination must also be linked to territorial institutions. Emergency actors often operate their own assessment, financing, and monitoring systems. Such arrangements may be necessary during an acute crisis, but over time they can weaken municipalities if they create parallel delivery and accountability systems. A responsible territorial approach seeks to reconcile operational speed and humanitarian principles with the strengthening of local public capacity.

3. Analysis

Municipal weakness reflects the long-standing concentration of power, resources, services, and decision-making capacity around Port-au-Prince (OECD, 2021). The January 12, 2010 earthquake marked a major break in this trajectory. The U.S. Geological Survey recorded a magnitude of 7.0 and located the epicenter 10 km southeast of Léogâne (U.S. Geological Survey, 2010). The earthquake devastated parts of the metropolitan area and Léogâne, while the United Nations reported major damage in Jacmel (United Nations, 2010). According to estimates cited by the World Bank, approximately 230,000 people died, 300,000 were injured, and more than 1.5 million were displaced; damage and losses reached $7.8 billion, about 120% of Haiti's 2009 GDP (World Bank, 2019).

The earthquake did not create Haiti's structural imbalances. Institutions, services, businesses, financial institutions, and strategic infrastructure were already disproportionately concentrated around the capital, while many municipalities had limited administrative and financial capacity (OECD, 2021; World Bank, 2019). Destruction of public offices, schools, hospitals, housing, and infrastructure disrupted national planning and services and displaced hundreds of thousands toward receiving areas (Government of the Republic of Haiti, 2010). Although reconstruction restored functions and infrastructure, the persistence of service concentration, municipal weakness, and external dependence suggests that it was insufficiently integrated with territorial rebalanc ing; this is an analytical interpretation, not a denial of documented sectoral achievements. From 2010 to 2026, earthquake effects interacted with political instability, successive disasters, institutional weakening, the July 2021 assassination of President Moïse, expanding armed -group influence, mass displacement, and disruption of agricultural a reas. Excessive centralization thus constrained both territorial resilience and state continuity. Municipalities should be treated as components of the state, not substitutes for it: the central government retains sovereign responsibilities, while adequately resourced municipalities may maintain selected services, organize territorial information, and coordinate assistance to displaced populations and other interventions.

The crisis after July 7, 2021 exposed fragile succession mechanisms, eroded democratic representation, and deepened dependence on an overburdened central architecture. Haiti has held no national elections since 2016; Parliament has been inactive since 2019 ; and no elected national officials remained after January 2023. At the August 11, 2026 cut -off, electoral preparations had not restored elected national institutions (Human Rights Watch, 2026; Caribbean Community [CARICOM], 2026d; Conseil électoral provisoire [CEP], 2026a). Decentralization may support continuity when central institutions are paralyzed, but Haitian municipalities generally remain too weak to perform that role sustainably.

After the Transitional Presidential Council's mandate expired on February 7, 2026, Prime Minister Alix Didier Fils-Aimé and the Council of Ministers assumed executive responsibility. CARICOM described the interim arrangement as focused on stability, securi ty, and elections, and its July 8 statement continued to present the government as operating under the prime minister's leadership (CARICOM, 2026a, 2026b, 2026c). This differed from the 2024 Presidential Council of seven voting members and two observers (CARICOM, 2024). These exceptional arrangements maintained continuity but underscored the gap between practical necessity, ordinary constitutional procedures, and democratic authorization.

On July 27, 2026, the CEP published the 2026–2027 electoral calendar, welcomed by the CARICOM Eminent Persons Group. It scheduled the first presidential and legislative round and popular ratification of proposed constitutional changes for December 13, 2026, and a second round and territorial elections for February 21, 2027. The CEP made the calendar conditional on security and financing (CEP, 2026a; CARICOM, 2026d). By August 11, it had announced 29 operational registration and voting centers in the West and approved 15 of 18 registered political groupings; coalition registration was under way (CEP, 2026b, 2026c). These steps document progress, not certainty that elections will occur as announced.

At the cut-off date, the security crisis was territorial as well as political. Armed groups controlled or contested roads, markets, ports, transportation corridors, production areas, and commodity flows. OHCHR reported expanding gang reach, including key road and maritime routes (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights [OHCHR], 2026). BINUH recorded at least 1,642 deaths and 745 injuries from January through March 2026, noting localized advances in downtown Port-au-Prince alongside continued spread into Artibonite and the Centre Department (United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti [BINUH], 2026). At the January 22, 2025 Security Council briefing, United Nations officials documented coordinated gang attacks across Port -au- Prince and emphasized the continuing role of illicit arms flows and organized criminal networks in Haiti’s security deterioration (United Nations Security Council, 2025).

Violence in Artibonite has national agricultural implications. A FAO/WFP assessment estimated that the Artibonite Valley produced about 60% of Haiti's rice in 2010, while the Inter -American Development Bank described the department in 2023 as a breadbasket for maize, sorghum, and rice, with roughly 28,000 irrigated hectares and more than half of the country's rice cultivation area (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO] and World Food Programme [WFP], 2010; Inter -American Development Bank [IDB], 2023). These figures establish structural importance, not 2026 output. IOM event tracking documented about 3,225 people displaced in Dessalines and Petite-Rivière from July 6–15, 2026 and 705 in Saint-Marc from July 12–15, mostly or entirely hosted by families (International Organization for Migration [IOM], 2026b, 2026c). These event reports should not be added to the nationwide displacement stock.

The latest IPC projection available at the cut-off, covering March–June 2026, estimated that more than 5.83 million people—52% of the analyzed population—faced acute food insecurity at Phase 3 or above. It linked the crisis to violence, climatic shocks, ec onomic collapse, agricultural constraints, limited basic services, and governance challenges (Integrated Food Security Phase Classification [IPC], 2026). Separately, IOM's Round 13, based on data collected March 14 –May 17, estimated 1,466,862 internally displaced people; 79% were outside the capital and 43% were concentrated in ten municipalities (IOM, 2026a). No later nationwide round was identified by August 11; July tracking updated specific events rather than the national estimate. The broader pattern of forced displacement and emigration also affects teachers, public administrators, entrepreneurs, health professionals, lawyers, agronomists, engineers, and students. Documented destinations include the United States, Canada, the Domin ican Republic, Brazil, and Chile. Available literature describes these departures as a potential loss of human capital that may weaken health, education, public administration, and the economy, while emphasizing the diversity of migrants' profiles and trajectories (Douyon, 2023).

For municipalities, human-capital loss and internal displacement create a dual burden. They may lose people capable of managing, planning, training, and administering public action while receiving displaced populations without the financial, technical, and institutional means required to meet additional needs. Decentralization therefore cannot be separated from human capital: legal designation alone cannot make a municipality effective without professional staff, technical personnel, records, local revenue, and basic security.

Training citizens, public officials, and local administrators remains essential. When universities, faculties, vocational schools, and training institutions operate only partially or irregularly, the pipeline through which Haiti develops public-sector skills is threatened. Available sources document repeated disruption across school and higher education, although figures vary by period, definition of closure, and location (Human Rights Watch, 2026). The consequences extend beyond missed instruction: prolonged disruption constrains the preparation of lawyers, administrators, agronomists, engineers, urban planners, social workers, physicians, teachers, and territorial- management specialists needed for municipal reconstruction, planning, budget management, land administration, and civic oversight.

Any analysis of recent Haitian governance must account for international actors without reducing the crisis to external domination. Transitional arrangements, electoral negotiations, security mechanisms, and diplomatic initiatives arise from continuous interaction among Haitian actors, regional partners, and international powers.

BINUH describes the Core Group as a diplomatic framework bringing together the UN Secretary- General's Special Representative, ambassadors from several states and the European Union, and the Organization of American States' Special Representative. This composition establishes a consultation mechanism but confers no formal legal authority over Haitian institutions (United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti [BINUH], 2020).

International influence creates two related tensions. External arrangements insufficiently grounded in national deliberation may weaken perceived legitimacy and territorial ownership, while diplomatic and operational support may contribute to governmental continuity, security, and electoral preparation. This distinction assumes neither that international support replaces national sovereignty nor that it lacks value during severe crisis (BINUH, 2020; Brinkerhoff, 2005). Security must therefore be understood through a human-security lens encompassing food, water, education, health care, mobility, justice, housing, employment, protection from violence, and dignity. Municipalities can contribute only if protected, adequately financed, professionalized, and integrated into a coherent national strategy.

A stronger municipality could map needs, track internal displacement, coordinate community organizations, organize local consultation, support market protection, identify priority infrastructure, and connect citizens, national authorities, and international partners. It cannot do so alone: the central state must establish the legal and policy framework, ensure security, transfer resources, strengthen local administrations, and oversee public funds.

Territorial reconstruction thus requires security, governance, and development to advance as interdependent objectives. Restoring control over neighborhoods or roads is insufficient if local institutions remain absent, services do not resume, citizens cannot participate, and young people see no viable future. State presence must be administrative, social, educational, judicial, and territorial, not merely coercive.

The 2021 rupture also deepened a long-standing weakness in political representation. The prolonged absence of elections and Parliament's inactivity reduced ordinary oversight. Transitional arrangements preserved minimum executive continuity but highlighted the gap between practical necessity and democratic legitimacy. Irregular renewal of local mandates likewise limits municipalities' capacity to provide representative government close to citizens.

Intermunicipal cooperation can address limitations of scale in waste management, roads, water systems, markets, watershed management, civil protection, and selected technical services. It should not become an additional tier without accountability. Agreements must specify contributions, representation, ownership of assets, decision-making rules, dispute-resolution procedures, audit arrangements, and citizen participation.

Coordination between municipalities and nongovernmental organizations should avoid substitution and subordination. Substitution occurs when parallel systems replace public functions without strengthening local capacity; subordination occurs when a municipality merely implements externally designed projects. A balanced relationship requires shared diagnosis, alignment with territorial priorities, disclosure of interventions, community participation, and gradual transfer of responsibilities when feasible.

A coherent territorial approach to humanitarian and development aid requires municipalities to be informed, involved in priority-setting, and integrated into monitoring without allowing impracticable procedures to obstruct urgent action. Projects should align with municipal priorities and local development plans, and municipalities should participate in defining, coordinating, and evaluating interventions.

Nongovernmental organizations can contribute technical assistance, community mobilization, training, agricultural, health and education programs, environmental initiatives, small-scale infrastructure, and risk management. Without municipal coordination, however, localized results may coexist with weaker local planning and governance. Parallel assessments, committees, timetables, and accountability systems may facilitate short-term delivery but erode local legitimacy and capacity over time.

Decentralized cooperation includes twinning, institutional partnerships, exchanges of experience, technical assistance, and cooperation between Haitian territorial authorities and foreign local governments. The 2006 framework decree expressly contemplates this form of cooperation (Republic of Haiti, 2006).

Twinning and territorial partnerships are useful when they pursue clear objectives—such as administrative training, water, waste management, agriculture, environmental protection, education, or local economic development—and specify responsibilities, resources, results, monitoring, and accountability. They are less useful when symbolic or detached from local needs. Residents and municipal institutions should participate so that cooperation does not become a relationship among administrative elites.

Fignolé (2012: 169) argues that insufficient intellectual and technical capacity within territorial authorities is a serious obstacle to decentralization. Decentralization requires not only legal texts and formal transfers, but also trained personnel, management tools, local planning capacity, and an administrative culture capable of sustaining municipal public action.

Capacity development is therefore central to state modernization and extends beyond individuals to organizational, procedural, financial, and political dimensions.

Interoperability among public information systems is another institutional requirement. The General Directorate of Taxes, National Port Authority, immigration services, and other public bodies should be able to exchange information to improve coordination, reduce fraud, and strengthen administrative oversight.

Such interoperability can strengthen governance only within a clear legal and institutional framework. Information systems must comply with law, data-protection requirements, transparency standards, and oversight mechanisms; otherwise, they may become instruments of opacity or abusive surveillance.

4. Discussion

Taken together, the systemic shock of 2010 and the deterioration of conditions between 2021 and 2026 support conceptualizing decentralization as a component of national resilience. The objective is not to presume automatic local effectiveness, but to reduce single points of failure by developing public administrations, regional services, and information systems capable of maintaining selected functions when the center is disrupted.

The limitations of post-2010 reconstruction suggest that a strategy centered primarily on Port-au- Prince would reproduce the vulnerability revealed by the earthquake. A territorially balanced reconstruction strategy should combine restoration of central in stitutions with the strengthening of secondary cities, agricultural municipalities, economic corridors, and regional services through explicit national budget priorities. Recovery investments should also be assessed in terms of their contribution to reducing territorial dependencies and sustaining essential services. Transferring responsibilities without corresponding capacity would nevertheless be counterproductive. It would shift the burden of a national crisis onto local territories while households, associations, and institutions are already being depleted by prolo nged violence, displacement, and poverty. The central state must provide the security, resources, and coordination framework required for municipalities to perform assigned functions.

International cooperation can provide resources and expertise, but it can also bypass local institutions. This risk is particularly acute when projects operate on short timelines and use accountability systems oriented exclusively toward donors. A territor ial approach should require that municipalities be informed, that interventions be compatible with local plans, that budgets be transparent, and that exit strategies prevent service collapse after project closure. Intermunicipal cooperation will be viable only if it rests on clear governance arrangements. Municipalities must be able to cooperate without obscuring their respective responsibilities. Balanced representation is necessary to prevent more populous or bett er-funded jurisdictions from imposing their priorities. Contribution rules, audit requirements, service indicators, and grievance mechanisms should be established when an agreement is created. Citizen participation should also extend to the intermunicipal level.

Security, governance, and development must be integrated. A security operation that does not restore public services and administration leaves a vacuum that may be reoccupied. A development project implemented without adequate security remains vulnerable, while governance reform without resources cannot ensure institutional continuity. Reconstruction therefore requires a coordinated sequence of security stabilization, administrative restoration, resumption of services, economic recovery, and citizen participation.

The central state's sovereign functions remain indispensable and cannot be replaced: security, justice, macroeconomic policy, border control, national standards, and redistribution. Territorial reconstruction requires a clear vertical allocation of responsibilities and horizontal coordination among municipalities for problems that exceed administrative boundaries. It also requires service- continuity plans, secure information systems, and emergency financing mechanisms.

Conclusion

The research question addressed the territorial effects of successive crises between 2010 and 2026 and the potential contribution of municipalities to institutional resilience. The analysis identified two principal disruptions: the January 2010 earthquake, which exposed the risks of hyperconcentration, and the institutional and security crisis that began in July 2021, which intensified service disruption, displacement, and territorial fragmentation.

This cumulative sequence demonstrates that reconstruction cannot be limited to restoring central institutions. It must also reduce the territorial vulnerabilities exposed in 2010 and aggravated since 2021. Municipalities can contribute to continuity of selected services, stakeholder coordination, information management, and protection of populations, but only as components of a national architecture endowed with effective authority, capacity, and resources.

Necessary conditions include minimum security, political legitimacy, predictable resources, qualified personnel, information systems, and accountability mechanisms. Intermunicipal and international cooperation can expand the scale of services and strengthen local capacity, provided that these arrangements remain transparent, coordinated with the state, and free of parallel systems that bypass public institutions.

Public policy should integrate continuity of essential services, support for host municipalities, protection of agricultural corridors, and strengthening of regional administrations and university campuses into a national strategy for territorial reconstruction.

The analysis remains limited by its document-based design and the rapid evolution of the underlying data. Comparative research on host municipalities, public-service networks, the costs of centralization, intermunicipal cooperation, and the resilience of regional universities would enable the article's propositions to be tested empirically.

Ultimately, municipalities cannot replace the central state. Their contribution depends on the simultaneous reconstruction of national authority and of territorial institutions capable of ensuring an effective state presence throughout the country.

References

  • Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
  • Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2005). Rebuilding governance in failed states and post-conflict societies: Core concepts and cross-cutting themes. Public Administration and Development, 25(1), 3– 14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.352
  • Caribbean Community. (2024, March 11). Outcome declaration of CARICOM, international partners and Haitian stakeholders. https://caricom.org/outcome-declaration-of-caricom- international-partners-and-haitian-stakeholders/
  • Caribbean Community. (2026a, February 10). Statement by the Conference of Heads of Government of the Caribbean Community: End of the Transitional Presidential Council in Haiti. https://caricom.org/statement-by-the-conference-of-heads-of-government-of-the- caribbean-community-caricom-end-of-the-transitional-presidential-council-in-haiti/
  • Caribbean Community. (2026b, May 27). Communiqué | Twenty-ninth meeting | Council for Foreign and Community Relations (COFCOR) | Paramaribo, Suriname, 20–21 May 2026. https://caricom.org/twenty-ninth-meeting-council-for-foreign-and-community-relations- cofcor-paramaribo-suriname-20-21-may-2026/
  • Caribbean Community. (2026c, July 8). Statement by the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) in support of the Republic of Haiti . https://caricom.org/statement-by-the-caribbean- community-caricom-in-support-of-the-republic-of-haiti/
  • Caribbean Community. (2026d, July 27). Statement from the CARICOM Eminent Persons Group: Transmission of the electoral calendar. https://caricom.org/statement-from-the- caricom-eminent-persons-group-transmission-of-the-electoral-calendar/
  • Conseil électoral provisoire. (2026a, July 27). Publication officielle du calendrier électoral 2026–2027 [Official publication of the 2026–2027 electoral calendar]. https://cephaiti.ht/publication-officielle-du-calendrier-electoral-2026-2027/
  • Conseil électoral provisoire. (2026b, August 6). Ouverture de 19 nouveaux centres d’inscription et de vote dans le département de l’Ouest [Opening of 19 new registration and voting centers in the West Department]. https://cephaiti.ht/ouverture-de-19-nouveaux-centres- dinscription-et-de-vote-dans-le-departement-de-louest/
  • Conseil électoral provisoire. (2026c, August 8). Publication de la liste des groupements politiques agréés [Publication of the list of approved political groupings]. https://cephaiti.ht/publication-de-la-liste-des-groupements-politiques-agrees/
  • Douyon, E. (2023, July 5). Haitians flee a nation nearing collapse. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/haitians-flee-collapse
  • Duit, A. (2016). Resilience thinking: Lessons for public administration. Public Administration, 94(2), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12182
  • Fignolé, J.-C. (2012). Décentralisation: Opportunités, limites et contraintes [Decentralization: Opportunities, limits, and constraints]. In J.-D. Rainhorn (Ed.), Haïti, réinventer l’avenir (pp. 161–170). Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme; Université d’État d’Haïti.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, & World Food Programme. (2010, September 21). Mission FAO/PAM d’évaluation de la récolte et de la sécurité alimentaire en Haïti [FAO/WFP crop and food security assessment mission to Haiti]. https://www.fao.org/4/ak353f/ak353f00.htm
  • Government of the Republic of Haiti. (2010, March). Haiti earthquake PDNA (Post-Disaster Needs Assessment): Assessment of damage, losses, general and sectoral needs. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents- reports/documentdetail/355571468251125062
  • Human Rights Watch. (2026). World report 2026: Haiti. https://www.hrw.org/world- report/2026/country-chapters/haiti
  • Inter-American Development Bank. (2023, November 9). Empowering agriculture in Haiti’s Artibonite Department with solar-powered irrigation. https://www.iadb.org/en/blog/nature- climate-and-disaster-risk/empowering-agriculture-haitis-artibonite-department-solar- powered-irrigation
  • Integrated Food Security Phase Classification. (2026, April 16). Haiti: Acute food security situation projection update for March–June 2026. https://www.ipcinfo.org/ipc-country- analysis/details-map/en/c/1162842/
  • International Organization for Migration. (2026a, May 26). Haiti—Key information sheet on the displacement situation—Round 13. Displacement Tracking Matrix. https://dtm.iom.int/reports/haiti -information-sheet-displacement-situation-round-13-may- 2026
  • International Organization for Migration. (2026b, July 16). Haiti—Emergency Tracking Tool 101.1—Update on displacements following armed violence in the municipalities of Dessalines and Petite-Rivière—Artibonite Department (6–15 July 2026). Displacement Tracking Matrix. https://dtm.iom.int/reports/haiti -emergency-tracking-tool-1011-update- displacements-following-armed-violences
  • International Organization for Migration. (2026c, July 16). Haiti—Emergency Tracking Tool 102—Displacements following armed violence in the municipality of Saint -Marc— Artibonite Department (12–15 July 2026). Displacement Tracking Matrix. https://dtm.iom.int/reports/haiti -emergency-tracking-tool-102-displacements-following- armed-violences-municipality-0
  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2026, March 24). Gangs expand reach in Haiti amid persistent deadly violence . https://www.ohchr.org/en/press- releases/2026/03/gangs-expand-reach-haiti-amid-persistent-deadly-violence-un-human- rights
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Making decentralisation work: A handbook for policy-makers. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/g2g9faa7- en
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). OECD public governance reviews: Haiti—Strengthening public administration for resilient and sustainable governance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfd5f806-en
  • Republic of Haiti. (2006, June 14). Décret fixant le cadre général de la décentralisation ainsi que les principes d’organisation et de fonctionnement des collectivités territoriales haïtiennes [Decree establishing the general framework for decentralization and the principles governing the organization and operation of Haitian territorial authorities]. Le Moniteur, No. 57.
  • United Nations. (2010, January 13). Noon briefing of 13 January 2010. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/highlight/2010 -01-13.html
  • United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Human development report 1994: New dimensions of human security . New York: Oxford University Press. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human -development-report-1994
  • United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti. (2020, February 1). Core Group press release. https://binuh.unmissions.org/en/news/core-group-press-release
  • United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti. (2026, May 8). Haiti: More than 1,600 people killed in the first quarter of 2026, a human rights situation that remains extremely worrying. https://binuh.unmissions.org/en/press-releases/haiti-more-than-1600-people-killed-in-the- first-quarter-of-2026-a-human
  • United Nations Security Council. (2025, January 22). The question concerning Haiti: 9844th meeting (S/PV.9844). United Nations. https://docs.un.org/en/S/PV.9844
  • U.S. Geological Survey. (2010). M 7.0—10 km SE of Léogâne, Haiti. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usp000h60h
  • World Bank. (2019, May 3). Rebuilding Haitian infrastructure and institutions . https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2019/05/03/rebuilding-haitian-infrastructure-and- institutions

← Back to all articles